Identity and Access Management
Review users, roles, service identities, privilege assignment, authentication controls and access-key practices.
Testing & Assurance
Cybersentinels Consulting assesses cloud environments for identity, configuration, network, logging, storage and data-protection weaknesses that may create unauthorized access or exposure.
Our cloud security assessments help organizations understand risk within the shared-responsibility model and prioritize improvements across in-scope cloud services and accounts.
Cloud platforms provide powerful security capabilities, but they also introduce complex identities, permissions, services and configuration choices. Excessive privileges, public storage, weak network boundaries or missing logging may expose resources even when the underlying platform is secure.
We evaluate the organization-controlled portions of the cloud environment using available configuration evidence, authorized access and relevant security checks. The assessment may focus on one account or subscription, a defined workload or a broader multi-account environment.
Coverage is tailored to the selected provider, services, architecture and access model. AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud or mixed environments may be assessed subject to agreed scope and capability requirements.
Depending on platform and scope, assessment may include:
Review users, roles, service identities, privilege assignment, authentication controls and access-key practices.
Assess virtual networks, routing, security groups, firewalls, public exposure and administrative access.
Review public access, permissions, encryption, key use, backup and sensitive-data exposure.
Evaluate security logging, audit trails, alerting, retention and visibility across relevant services.
Assess security-relevant configuration of virtual machines, containers, serverless services or managed workloads in scope.
Identify high-risk configuration weaknesses and gaps against relevant provider and organizational practices.
Review observable handling of credentials, tokens, keys and secrets across relevant services.
Evaluate selected backup, recovery and availability controls where included.
Review ownership, account organization, guardrails, policies and control consistency across the environment.
Understand providers, accounts, subscriptions, projects, regions, workloads, services, data and business criticality.
Agree on read-only access, exported configuration, documentation and security-tool evidence required for the assessment.
Review identities, permissions, network controls, storage, logging and relevant service configurations.
Identify public exposure, excessive privileges and combinations of weaknesses that may increase impact.
Consider exploitability, data sensitivity, workload criticality, exposure and available compensating controls.
Provide prioritized findings, corrective recommendations and a practical improvement roadmap.
Review remediation evidence or reassess selected configurations where included.
Useful scoping information includes:
Cloud assessment coverage depends on the providers, accounts, services, regions, access and evidence included. Provider-managed controls and services outside the agreed scope are not independently tested.
Not necessarily. Read-only access or exported configuration is generally preferred to reduce risk. Required permissions depend on the provider, services and assessment depth.
Yes, subject to agreed scope and service coverage. Multi-cloud environments are usually scoped by account, subscription, project, workload and provider.
No. A cloud security assessment primarily evaluates configuration, identities, architecture and governance. Controlled exploitation or workload penetration testing must be specifically authorized and scoped.
Where relevant and agreed, findings can be associated with applicable control areas. This does not replace a complete framework-specific readiness or certification assessment.
Share your cloud providers, account structure, key workloads and assessment objective. We will help define a practical and appropriately controlled review.